Neena’s Top Reading Research Picks for November - MetaMetrics Inc.
Skip to main content
Post Category:
Lexile, MetaMetrics
Post Tags:
Reading Research Recap

Neena’s Top Reading Research Picks for November

Neena's Top Reading Research Picks

Welcome to the Reading Research Recap!

I am Dr. Neena Saha, Research Advisor at MetaMetrics and founder and CEO of Elemeno, now a part of MetaMetrics. My focus is to bridge the research-practice gap so that educators can access real-time tools to support reading success. To expand the understanding of research to inform teaching and learning strategies, I put together this monthly compendium of the relevant and must-read research that impacts the reading and learning landscape. I offer research highlights in digestible summary slices. Hopefully, the data and findings you see here are useful to you as researchers, educators, and district and edtech leaders.


Hi everyone!

This month I strayed a bit, and instead of covering my usual RCTs, Metas, or experiments, I chose this paper, because it touches on “the why”: What Are the Long-Term Prospects for Children With Comprehension Weaknesses? A Registered Report Investigating Education and Employment Outcomes.

Background

We kinda know intuitively that struggling readers might have less than favorable outcomes compared to their typical-reading peers, but few studies have actually tracked outcomes past compulsory education (i.e. into early employment or higher education). I liked this study because it did just that!

Rationale

While there are many longitudinal studies examining outcomes of students with reading difficulties, many are small scale, few focus on students who struggle with comprehension difficulties (vs. word reading difficulties), and few follow students all the way into their 20s, examining their employment outcomes.

Methods

This study followed 6846 students in the UK who were identified as typical readers (no reading struggles) or as having comprehension or word reading difficulties at age 9 (mid-childhood). (Note that the data used in this study was from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; ALSPAC).

Educational achievement data (such as national test scores and grades) were tracked for all three groups, as well as a survey was sent out to examine their academic or employment status at age 20. 

Socio-demographic variables such as maternal education as well as free school meals were also collected to see how SES influences outcomes.

Results

National Test Outcomes in School

  • Typically developing readers were 2.38x more likely to meet or exceed national targets on national assessments than students with comprehension difficulties (and children with comprehension difficulties performed comparably to children with word-reading difficulties)
  • Interestingly, students with comprehension difficulties performed worse on Science and Math national tests than English (this ran counter to the researchers’ hypothesis)

National Targets Upon Leaving School

  • Typically-developing readers were 33% more likely to meet national targets than those with reading weaknesses. 
  • On the school-leaving assessments (when compulsory education ends), there were no significant differences between the students with word-reading difficulties vs. comprehension difficulties, but not surprisingly, both groups were below their typically-reading peers. 

Employment Outcomes

  • Children with comprehension difficulties were the most likely group to not be in higher education or employment at age 20 (9.34% of respondents), followed by those with word reading weaknesses(7.84%), followed by typically-reading peers (6.55%)
  • Children with comprehension difficulties were 43% more likely to not be in higher education or employment at age 20 compared to their peers
  • But, importantly, differences were not significant after controlling for socio-demographic factors, which means that (proxy) variables for SES like maternal education and free school lunch are really important!

Take-Home Message & Practical Implications

  • Struggling readers have less positive outcomes on national tests and are less likely to be employed or in higher education at age 20.
  • The authors also make the point that children with comprehension difficulties have just as poor outcomes as those with word reading difficulties but they are less likely to be identified.
  • Since teachers cannot directly influence SES, it is really important to identify and address reading difficulties in the early grades via appropriate assessments and explicit instruction!

**If you are interested to see my key takeaways and highlights from The Reading League Annual Conference, be sure to watch the YouTube Vlog version of the blog!**


Additional Research of Interest

Teacher Education, Legislation, Policy, Professional Development, Etc.

Dyslexia, Struggling or At-Risk Readers

Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Word-Reading

Dyslexia, Specific Learning Disabilities, At-risk or Struggling Readers

Fluency

Comprehension

Other


Sign up!

Want to start receiving monthly notifications for this series?

Create or log in to your Lexile® & Quantile® Hub account. Once logged in, navigate to your account to update your mailing list preferences.

Lexile and Quantile HubSpeaking of the Lexile & Quantile Hub — Exciting news!

A completely new version of the Lexile & Quantile Hub is here! The redesign features a streamlined user experience and enhanced accessibility to support a range of abilities.