Neena’s Top Reading Research Picks for October - MetaMetrics Inc.
Skip to main content
Post Category:
Lexile
Post Tags:
Reading Research Recap

Neena’s Top Reading Research Picks for October

Neena's Top Reading Research Picks

Welcome to the Reading Research Recap!

I am Dr. Neena Saha, Research Advisor at MetaMetrics and founder and CEO of Elemeno, now a part of MetaMetrics. My focus is to bridge the research-practice gap so that educators can access real-time tools to support reading success. To expand the understanding of research to inform teaching and learning strategies, I put together this monthly compendium of the relevant and must-read research that impacts the reading and learning landscape. I offer research highlights in digestible summary slices. Hopefully, the data and findings you see here are useful to you as researchers, educators, and district and edtech leaders.


🎃Special October Edition 🎃

Effects of teacher knowledge of early reading on students’ gains in reading foundational skills and comprehension

Video and Research Summary

What does reading/language have to do with magic, sorcery, and spells?

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” — Arthur C. Clarke

This quote is applicable to the invention of the alphabet (literally!). People thought that writing, and the alphabet in particular, was so incredible, elegant, and powerful, that it could not have originated from humans, but rather had divine/mystical origins. From the beginning, across many alphabetic cultures (and even cultures that had writing systems that were non-alphabetic), magic became associated with writing and letters, spells/spelling, and literacy.

Here’s a little bit more about the interesting link I mentioned in the video version of the Recap about how the word grammar started out as gramma and morphed into the word glamour:

  • Gramma: comes from the Greek for “something written” or “a letter of the alphabet”
  • Grammar: “grammar” derives from “gramma” and comes to mean “art of letters” but, because only the elite learned and practiced writing letters, it was seen as something magical and even occult-like (many people believed writing came from the Gods, and was not invented by humans given how “advanced” of an idea it was). Therefore, writing and letters took on a magical quality in many cultures (think of how the Runic alphabet is still infused with fortune-telling and magic today).
  • Glamour: the /r/ sound came to replace the /l/ sound in Scotland and the word came to mean something enchanting, alluring, like writing- which was associated with spells at that time. Over time, this morphed into enchanting and alluring in the physical sense of the word (i.e. “attractive” or “glamourous”).

Ok, on to the research…

Introduction

Background

  • Many school districts are investing in teacher training and professional development. While it seems like a logical assumption that more teacher knowledge = better student outcomes, what does the research say on the topic?

Rationale

  • Well, the existing research shows mixed results, perhaps because the prior studies had methodological limitations such as small sample sizes that limited the researchers’ ability to find effects (i.e., the study was underpowered). Therefore, this study addressed those limitations by using a large sample.

Method/Design

  • Teacher knowledge was assessed using a researcher-created 50-item test of English language knowledge (it consisted of 5 domains: Phonological Sensitivity, Phonemic Awareness, Decoding, Spelling and Morphology). Student performance was measured by the MAP Growth (for primary grades) test in the fall and spring. The study included 9,640 K&1 students in 112 Arkansas classrooms.

Results 

  • Teacher knowledge reliably predicted (correlation, not causation) student’s spring foundational skills (after controlling for student- and teacher-level variables):
    • “This finding provides empirical evidence to support the idea that teachers with a deep understanding of the content students are expected to learn positively influence their students’ reading outcomes.”
  • However, the results for comprehension (vs. foundational skills – which was described above) were not significant. The researchers said this was not surprising:
    • “The lack of a significant link between teacher knowledge and reading comprehension is not surprising. Our measure of teacher knowledge focused on knowledge of foundational reading skills and not specific knowledge of reading comprehension. Previous studies had found a modest effect of teacher knowledge on reading comprehension (Carlisle et al., 2009). However, Carlisle’s work used a teacher knowledge measure that included scenarios based on reading comprehension instruction, whereas our measure focused on foundational reading skills.”

Take-home Message

  • Teacher knowledge is important!
    • “These findings provide an empirical basis to support the growing number of legislative mandates focused on bolstering the training provided to teachers that in turn enables all students to learn to read.”

Future Research

  • Future research should examine how teacher knowledge relates to effective classroom practice, and what threshold of teacher knowledge is adequate. Also, a valid and reliable measure of teacher knowledge would be useful when designing teacher prep programs and professional development opportunities.

Additional Research of Interest

Phonics, Word Reading, Decoding

Dyslexia & Struggling Readers

Fluency

Vocabulary & Comprehension

Teacher Education, Teacher Perceptions

Other


Want to start receiving monthly notifications for this series?

Please register or sign in to your Lexile & Quantile Hub account and join our Reading Research mailing list.